On proof mining by cut-elimination
نویسنده
چکیده
We present cut-elimination as a method of proof mining, in the sense that hidden mathematical information can be extracted by eliminating lemmas from proofs. We present reductive methods for cutelimination and the method ceres (cut-elimination by resolution). A comparison of ceres with reductive methods is given and it is shown that the asymptotic behavior of ceres is superior to that of reductive methods (nonelementary speed-up). It is illustrated, how ceres can be extended and applied in practice for analyzing mathematical proofs. Finally we we give an application of ceres to a well-known proof of the infinitude of primes by Fürstenberg; this proof uses topological lemmas based on arithmetic progressions. These topological lemmas of the proof are eliminated by ceres and Euclid’s construction of primes is extracted. We also touch the problem of cut-elimination by resolution on induction proofs and discuss the limits of the method.
منابع مشابه
Clausal Analysis of First-order Proof Schemata
Proof schemata are a variant of LK-proofs able to simulate various induction schemes in first-order logic by adding so called proof links to the standard first-order LK-calculus. Proof links allow proofs to reference proofs thus giving proof schemata a recursive structure. Unfortunately, applying reductive cutelimination is non-trivial in the presence of proof links. Borrowing the concept of la...
متن کاملA Schütte-Tait Style Cut-Elimination Proof for First-Order Gödel Logic
We present a Schütte-Tait style cut-elimination proof for the hypersequent calculus HIF for first-order Gödel logic. This proof allows to bound the depth of the resulting cut-free derivation by 4 |d| ρ(d), where |d| is the depth of the original derivation and ρ(d) the maximal complexity of cut-formulas in it. We compare this Schütte-Tait style cut-elimination proof to a Gentzen style proof.
متن کاملProof Fragments, Cut-Elimination and Cut-Introduction
Cut-elimination is usually presented as a set of local proof reduction steps together with a terminating strategy thus showing the existence of cut-free proofs for all provable sequents. Viewing cut-elimination as a transformation of mathematical proofs, not only the existence but also the structure and content of the cut-free proofs deserves investigation. In this paper we use proof skeletons ...
متن کاملProof Transformation by CERES
Cut-elimination is the most prominent form of proof transformation in logic. The elimination of cuts in formal proofs corresponds to the removal of intermediate statements (lemmas) in mathematical proofs. The cut-elimination method CERES (cut-elimination by resolution) works by constructing a set of clauses from a proof with cuts. Any resolution refutation of this set then serves as a skeleton ...
متن کاملCut-Elimination: Experiments with CERES
Cut-elimination is the most prominent form of proof transformation in logic. The elimination of cuts in formal proofs corresponds to the removal of intermediate statements (lemmas) in mathematical proofs. The cut-elimination method CERES (cut-elimination by resolution) works by constructing a set of clauses from a proof with cuts. Any resolution refutation of this set can then serve as a skelet...
متن کامل